Should European Masters winners only compete as Masters Pros?

The new IFBB Pro League dilemma

By Gary Chappell

WHEN the dust settled in Milan at the NPC European Masters last month, a handful of athletes walked away with something bigger than medals: IFBB Pro League cards. For most people, this is the pinnacle of an amateur bodybuilding career – the ticket to the big league.

But in the days following the show, a quiet debate has begun around bodybuilding scene:

If you win your Pro Card in a Masters-only event, should you only compete in Masters?
Or does earning that card give you the right – and the expectation – to step into the Open?

This is not an abstract discussion. It's already affecting athletes who stood on that stage in Milan. And those who did not.

The core issue: A fairness problem nobody wants to talk about

At the European Masters, some competitors finished had, either this season or in previous seasons, placed behind athletes who were not even old enough to be eligible for that Milan show. Those younger athletes never got the chance to test themselves under the same judging panel, in the same format, on the same day.

Yet now, ironically, the older Masters athletes become IFBB Pros, while the younger, arguably better athletes from the same regional pool remain amateurs, partly because they are not old enough to win their professional status at a Masters show.

To many competitors watching from the sidelines, it raises eyebrows.

Is it fair that someone who wins a Pro Card in an age-restricted field can immediately jump into the Open Pro ranks – ahead of people who might have beaten them in a non-Masters comparison?

What the IFBB Pro League actually says

Winning a Pro Card – regardless of whether it’s from the Open, Juniors, or Masters – grants the same status:

You are a full IFBB Pro.
You may compete in any Pro division for which you qualify, including Open shows.
You do not have to stay in Masters competitions.

On paper, it is simple. In reality, it is more complicated.

Are Masters cards “easier”?

This is no disrespect to Masters athletes – in fact, quite the opposite. Many of them are incredible, often more complete, more conditioned and more polished than their younger counterparts. In fact, frontdouble.com recently published an article about how the Masters division is now raising the bar.

But the competitive depth in a Masters lineup is almost always thinner than the Open.

This means a Masters competitor can earn a Pro Card without ever beating the best amateurs in their region. And to some observers, that does not quite sit right. To others, however, it is simply the reward for longevity and commitment.

The practical consequence: Jumping the queue

Here’s the uncomfortable truth many athletes won’t say publicly:

With the greatest amount of respect, a Masters Pro Card can be considered a shortcut into the IFBB Pro League. And because stepping into the Open Pro ranks immediately raises your profile, it creates a situation where age-restricted victories produce Open-category professionals who did not get the nod when battling the top amateurs head-to-head. Perhaps this is why Masters Pro Card winners should compete only as Masters Pros, despite what the ruling says.

From a competitive integrity standpoint, that is a debate worth having.

So: Should Masters Pros stay in Masters?

There are three arguments:

1. YES – They should stay in Masters

Because the qualification was earned in an age-restricted setting. A Masters Pro should compete against other Masters Pros to maintain parity.

2. NO – A Pro Card is a Pro Card

The rules are the rules. If you’ve earned Pro status, you’ve earned the right to compete wherever you want.

3. The middle ground – a restructure

Some might argue for a system where:

Masters Pro Cards grant access to Masters Pro shows only, while Open Pro qualification must be earned against non-age-restricted competitors.

Where does this leave the European Masters?

The Milan show highlighted a structural reality in the sport:

You don’t need to beat the best amateurs to become an Open Pro — you just need to win the right show.

For some, that is an opportunity. For others, it is a distortion. But one thing is clear:

As Masters events continue to expand across Europe, this fairness question will grow louder, especially among the younger amateurs watching athletes they might have beaten step past them into the Pro ranks.

For clarity, no athlete should ever have their achievement devalued. And this is not what this article sets out to do. Winning any Pro Card requires discipline, sacrifice and a level of commitment most people will never understand.

But the sport evolves through honest conversations. And the European Masters has forced one.

LATEST POSTS:

DONATE